Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 04:56

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Android 16 QPR1 Beta 2 tests new Gemini launch animation with vibration - 9to5Google
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Braves Place Chris Sale On 15-Day IL With Ribcage Fracture - MLB Trade Rumors
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Quidem dolorum id soluta eius id maxime quas.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Caitlyn Jenner’s Israel Pride Parade Visit Disrupted by Iran War Breakout - The Hollywood Reporter
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Do all armies have the same rank structure?
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Paris Erupts in Celebrations, Riots After PSG Wins Champions League - WSJ